Best Women's Hiking Shoes of 2022

Whether you’re setting out on a casual day hike or hitting the trail with overnight gear, there’s a hiking shoe up for the task. Compared to traditional hiking boots, hiking shoes are characterized by their low-top design, which translates to less weight on your feet for covering ground quickly. To compile our top picks, the female editors at Switchback Travel took to the trail, testing out everything from heavy-duty leather hikers to cushioned trail runners and approach shoes originally intended for climbing. For more background information, see our women’s hiking shoe comparison table and buying advice below the picks.
 

---

Our Team's Women's Hiking Shoe Picks

• Best Overall Women's Hiking Shoe: Salomon X Ultra 3 GTX
• Best Budget Women's Hiking Shoe: Merrell Moab 2 Ventilator
• Best Lightweight/Cushioned Women's Hiking Shoe: Hoka One One Speedgoat 4
• Best Women's Shoe for Off-Trail Scrambling: La Sportiva TX4

---

Best Overall Women's Hiking Shoe

1. Salomon X Ultra 3 GTX ($150)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 7.2 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-GTX available)
What we like: Great on-trail performance in a lightweight build.
What we don’t: Less durable than a leather hiker and runs a little narrow.

Combining all the benefits of a sturdy hiking shoe into a nimble, running-inspired design, the Salomon X Ultra 3 GTX is our top all-around women’s pick of 2022. We’ve tried and tested various iterations of the X Ultra over the years and remain impressed by how well the shoe puts it all together on the trail. The 1-pound-7.2-ounce build won’t weigh you down, but you still get premium Gore-Tex waterproofing, decent stability, and a tread design that offers impressive grip in just about all conditions. And compared to leather hikers like the Merrell Moab 2 or KEEN Targhee below, the modern Salomon gives up surprisingly little in the way of protection, with a substantial toe cap and ample cushioning underfoot. 

The X Ultra 3 takes design hints from many of Salomon's trail running shoes: The Quicklace system is fast to use and provides a secure fit, and the shoe is far nimbler than traditional hikers like the aforementioned Merrell or KEEN. But it’s important to understand what you compromise with a non-leather hiking shoe: The Salomon falls a bit short in terms of durability, and the combination of synthetic upper and single-pull laces can't match the snug fit of a leather design. But these nitpicks aside, the X Ultra 3 is still our favorite shoe for anything from day hikes and quick summit pushes to carrying a lightweight overnight load. Keep in mind that the Salomon does run narrow in the toe box and midfoot—if you’re looking for a bit more room, check out the newer X Ultra 4 GTX, which we break down below. 
See the Salomon X Ultra 3 GTX

 

Best Budget Women's Hiking Shoe

2. Merrell Moab 2 Ventilator ($110)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 11 oz.
Waterproof: No (waterproof available)
What we like: A great all-around shoe for an affordable price.
What we don’t: Heavy and not built for technical terrain.

For those that prefer a more traditional hiking shoe, there’s a lot to love about the Moab 2 Ventilator. Merrell found a winning formula here, combining a comfortable fit with a sturdy yet lightweight feel—all for an affordable $110. The leather upper means you get a boost in protection and durability compared to synthetic designs like the Salomon above, and mesh panels offer better ventilation than an all-leather model like the Oboz Sapphire below. All in all, the Moab 2 Ventilator is a hardwearing and time-tested solution for day hikers and casual overnighters alike. 

While the Moab 2 checks all the boxes for moderate trails, the shoe is not meant for fast-paced or off-trail endeavors. On rocky and muddy trails, we’ve found that traction and stability fall short of gripper and closer-fitting designs like Salomon’s X Ultra 3 above and Cross Hike below. And despite clocking in well under 2 pounds, the Merrell is the heaviest design here and will feel clunky and cumbersome if you’re used to a more running shoe-inspired design. For a modern and lightweight budget pick, check out the Salomon X Raise or Merrell MQM Flex 2, which both retail for $110. But for folks that don’t need cutting-edge performance, the Moab 2 is a wonderful shoe with a long and reputable track record to back it up. Finally, Merrell also makes the Moab 2 Waterproof ($135; 1 lb. 12 oz.) and the nimble Moab Speed Low ($130; 1 lb. 5 oz.).
See the Merrell Moab 2 Ventilator

 

Best Lightweight/Cushioned Women's Hiking Shoe

3. Hoka One One Speedgoat 4 ($145)

Category: Trail runner
Weight: 1 lb. 2.4 oz.
Waterproof: No (waterproof available)
What we like: Extremely comfortable thanks to the thick cushioning and flexible construction.
What we don’t: Tall stack height can result in instability.

Running brand Hoka One One is no stranger to trail-ready footwear, and their lightweight and cushioned designs have made a recent entrance into the hiking market. Built as a trail runner, the Speedgoat 4 has been adopted by the thru-hiking community as a durable, capable shoe that can meet the demands of hikers and minimalist backpackers alike. In true Hoka style, the Speedgoat features a super thick midsole that isolates you nicely from uneven terrain, and you still get ample firmness for covering serious ground. Following suit, the outsole is impressively grippy and—although non-traditional—we found ourselves really appreciating the athletic and sprightly feel of the rockered sole.

If you’re thinking about going with a trail running shoe for hiking, there are a few important considerations to keep in mind. In terms of trail performance, you get far less protection from rocks and roots, and the flexible build translates to noticeably less stability on uneven ground (especially while carrying a load). And durability-wise, a minimalist shoe like the Speedgoat will pack out, abrade, and lose its cushion more quickly than a burly hiking-specific model. But it’s hard to argue with the myriad thru-hikers that routinely log 20-plus-mile days (with an overnight load) wearing the Speedgoat. For those that stick to the trail and travel light and fast, the Hoka One One is definitely worth a look. And a final note: Hoka recently released an updated version of the Speedgoat (the "5"), but with a firmer midsole, more welded overlays on the upper, and the option of a waterproof model, we think the 4 here is still the better choice for most hikers.
See the Hoka One One Speedgoat 4

 

Best Women's Shoe for Off-Trail Scrambling

4. La Sportiva TX4 ($140)

Category: Approach shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 4.8 oz.
Waterproof: No
What we like: Confidence-inspiring grip and protection in a lightweight package.
What we don’t: Stiffer than most of the hiking shoes here.

Joining the Speedgoat above is another non-traditional hiker: La Sportiva's TX4. Despite the TX4's approach shoe designation, it’s a fantastically tough and capable shoe that shines on off-trail terrain and is a favorite among both the hikers and climbers at Switchback Travel. A sticky Vibram sole means you get confidence-inspiring traction on rock, and the generous rubber rand and stiff midsole provide critical protection and stability while boulder hopping or scrambling up slabs. To top it off, we’ve been particularly blown away by the TX4’s leather upper, which has withstood an incredible amount of abuse with no signs of wearing down (you’ll likely need a resole long before the upper starts to deteriorate).

However, while the TX4 is ideal if you’re tackling a mix of cross-country and on-trail travel, it wouldn’t be our first choice as a dedicated trail shoe. For one, it’s a bit stiffer than most other options here (especially when compared to trail runners like the Speedgoat above), which will start to wear on you at mile 20 of 25. Second, while the dotty tread is incredible on rock (and surprisingly snow, too), it doesn't bite as well into dirt or mud as the sharp lugs of a true hiking model. If you like the look and feel of the TX4 but want something a little different, check out the mesh TX3 and TX Guide, the latter of which features a narrower, more cushioned build with the same climbing-inspired sole… Read in-depth review 
See the La Sportiva TX4

 

Best of the Rest

5. Salomon OUTline Low GTX ($130)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 4.5 oz.
Waterproof: Yes
What we like: Lightweight, agile, and grippy, with great crossover appeal.
What we don’t: Underbuilt for longer distances and technical terrain.

There’s no shortage of Salomon offerings on this list, but the OUTline Low GTX is a favorite among our female staff team. With a hiking-shoe-meets-trail-runner build, the OUTline has appeal for everything from long day hikes and light backpacking to shorter trail runs. It’s slightly lighter than the X Ultra 3 GTX above at 1 pound 4.5 ounces, and forgoes some of the X Ultra’s stability and cushion with a more streamlined midsole. The end result is a nimble and responsive shoe that still offers a step up in support and traction from trail runners like the Hoka Speedgoat above or Altra Lone Peak below.

We recently tested the OUTline Low GTX on a trip to Southern Patagonia, logging over 100 miles on everything from hardpack trail to talus and soggy tundra. Although the shoe was surprisingly capable for both day hikes and overnight trips, we did find its limit while carrying a heavy load over technical terrain—comfort started to suffer, our feet grew noticeably tired, and the mesh-heavy build took a bit of a beating. But we nevertheless appreciated the OUTline’s confidence-inspiring traction and agile feel (we strongly preferred it over the leather hiking boot we were also testing), and it doesn’t hurt that the sleek and modern styling transitions well to around-town use. Finally, keep in mind that the OUTline is also available in a non-waterproof version ($110), and a mid-height boot ($150), which offers a sizable bump in protection... Read in-depth review
See the Salomon OUTline Low GTX

 

6. La Sportiva Spire GTX ($190)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 10.2 oz.
Waterproof: Yes
What we like: Incredible performance for everything from easy trails to scrambling.
What we don’t: Heavy and pricey.

We hesitate recommending many of the shoes here for much more than hiking on established trails, but the burly La Sportiva Spire GTX is a notable exception. In short, the Spire is about as close to backpacking-ready as a hiking shoe gets—with a relatively high collar, La Sportiva goes so far as calling it a low-cut hiking boot. The thickly cushioned yet relatively stiff midsole offers a great balance of comfort, protection, and support, which comes in handy for high-mileage days and off-trail scrambling. Throw in excellent grip, good breathability (for a waterproof design), and the top-shelf quality we’ve come to expect from this Italian climbing brand, and you have one of the more capable hiking shoes on the market.

Why isn’t the La Sportiva Spire ranked higher? Our main reason is price: at $190, the Spire is the most expensive pick on this list, even topping the high-end Arc’teryx Aerios FL below. Second, at 1 pound 10.2 ounces for the women’s pair, it’s definitely more shoe than most day hikers need. But if you're willing to make the investment and don’t mind the extra few ounces underfoot, this is a great one-quiver option for everything from early-season hiking/trail running and backpacking to scrambling 14ers in Colorado. And if you prefer over-the-ankle coverage, La Sportiva offers a mid-height version (the Stream GTX) for just $9 more.
See the La Sportiva Spire GTX

 

7. Scarpa Rush Low GTX ($189)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 7.3 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-GTX available)
What we like: Great combination of stability and cushion; durable and protective for a synthetic shoe.
What we don’t: Expensive; low collar limits ankle support.

The Rush Low GTX might have the appearance of a running shoe, but Scarpa’s newest trail offering is a capable hiker that delivers excellent performance on even the trickiest of terrain. You get a durable fabric upper with welded reinforcements, burly midsole with EVA foam and TPU reinforcements for cushion and stability (we’ve found the Rush to be overall stiffer and more cushioned than the X Ultra 4 below), and a sticky outsole with a rockered profile that facilitates quick movements. To top it off, a Gore-Tex membrane keeps your feet protected from the elements (the shoe is also offered in a non-GTX version). All told, it’s a robust hiking shoe that offers much of the performance and durability of a leather design in a lighter and more nimble package.

The Rush Low has been our hiking shoe of choice for the last few months for everything from day hikes in Patagonia to climbing approaches in Zion. We much prefer it to the newest X Ultra: The fit is more accommodating in the midfoot without being too roomy in the forefoot, and the combination of stability and cushion is far superior to the Salomon’s rigid heel and flexible midfoot. But there are a few downsides: The Rush Low GTX is undeniably pricey at $189 (the non-waterproof version—if you can find it—is $159) and the collar rides fairly low, resulting in less ankle support than shoes like the La Sportiva Spire above and X Ultra 4 below. Further, despite its trail-runner vibe, it’s relatively heavy and noticeably clunkier than a shoe like the streamlined OUTline above. But the Scarpa nevertheless offers some of the best on-trail performance and comfort of any model here, making it one of our favorite hiking shoes of 2022... Read in-depth review
See the Scarpa Rush Low GTX

 

8. Salomon Cross Hike GTX ($160)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 6.9 oz.
Waterproof: Yes
What we like: A sprightly hiking shoe with impressive grip on soft terrain.
What we don’t: Less durable than the X Ultra and subpar traction on wet rock.

If you haven’t yet noticed a trend in our picks, the Salomon Cross Hike should make things abundantly clear. Gone are the days of hitting the trail in leather clunkers—trail-runner-inspired hiking shoes have all but taken over. And the Cross Hike is about as purpose-built as it gets: Salomon took their Speedcross running shoe (a popular choice for mountain terrain), beefed up the protection and support, and lowered the stack height for greater stability. The result is a shoe that’s light and speedy on the trail but robust enough to tackle everything from third-class scrambling to hauling an overnight load.

The relatively new Cross Hike joins the X Ultra (and plenty of others) in Salomon’s lineup and slots in as a slightly lighter and nimbler option for those who love to move fast. That said, we found it to be less stable—not great news for new hikers or if you’re carrying a lot of weight—and a step down in all-out durability (the upper started to delaminate after some rough use). Finally, while the Cross Hike’s sharp lugs bite nicely into soft terrain, traction does suffer on smooth, slippery surfaces like wet rocks. In the end, the Cross Hike is a step up in overall performance from a trail runner like the Speedgoat above and a better match for moving quickly on technical trails, but we’ll stick with the $10-cheaper X Ultra 3 for more demanding hiking and backpacking.
See the Salomon Cross Hike GTX

 

9. Danner Trail 2650 Campo ($160)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 2 oz.
Waterproof: No (waterproof available)
What we like: A lightweight and well-ventilated shoe for warm-weather hiking.
What we don’t: Expensive and not everyone will like the sock-like construction.

Danner is best known for its work boots, but the long-time footwear brand has made a nice transition to hikers of late. And the running-shoe-inspired Trail 2650 is clear about its intentions: with the mileage of the Pacific Crest Trail in its name, this shoe is designed to tackle some serious ground. The Trail 2650 is comfortable right out of the box, grippy with a Vibram outsole, and competitively light (especially for a partial-leather design) at 1 pound 2 ounces per pair. Finally, it manages to do what most hiking shoes don’t: look good in the process. All in all, we’re impressed with the direction that Danner is headed, and the Trail 2650 lineup has received rave reviews (from us included) since its release a few years back.

Of all of the designs in the Trail 2650 series, we like the Campo best. It tones down the rubber heel patch of the standard model, adds a lightweight mesh liner and well-vented upper, and knocks $10 off the price (for non-waterproof models). It also features a sock-like construction, which results in a really nice fit but can be difficult to get on. If you’re looking for a more traditional design or want a bit more protection, we’d recommend sticking with the standard Trail 2650. On the other hand, Danner offers an even lighter option in their 1-pound Trailcomber ($150), which is a great shoe for short jaunts in warm environments like the Southeast but falls well short of the Trail 2650 series in terms of on-trail performance... Read in-depth review
See the Danner Trail 2650 Campo

 

10. Altra Lone Peak 6 ($140)

Category: Trail runner/hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 1.4 oz.
Waterproof: No (waterproof available)
What we like: Super light, cushioned, and wildly comfortable.
What we don’t: Durability issues; roomy fit lacks performance on technical terrain.

If you think the Lone Peak looks more like a trail runner than a hiking shoe, you’re not mistaken. Like the Speedgoat above, Altra’s high-cushion, zero-drop Lone Peak was designed first as a running shoe and has since won the hearts of thru-hikers with its minimalist-yet-tough build. In place of the stiff midsole and burly rubber common among many traditional designs, the Lone Peak uses thick cushioning to isolate your foot from uneven terrain, resulting in a shoe that’s both lightweight and protective. It’s also wildly comfortable with Altra’s trademark zero-drop design and extra wide toe box—in fact, this is the shoe we recommend most for hikers that regularly suffer from hot spots and blisters.

Among thru-hikers, the Lone Peak’s biggest competitor is the Speedgoat above. With the Lone Peak, you get a lighter feel and trail-ready features like an integrated stone guard, built-in drainage ports, and gaiter trap. The Altra’s shorter stack height also puts you closer to the trail, which increases stability for many hikers (the Hoka One One can feel a little tippy and harder to trust on rocky terrain). But as with many minimalist options, we've had durability issues with various iterations of the Lone Peak (the rubber toe cap has a tendency to peel away from the upper), and the roomy toe box and zero-drop shape can detract from precision and stability. In the end, both the Altra and Hoka are legendary in their own right, and a final decision will likely come down to preferences on fit and cushioning.
See the Altra Lone Peak 6

 

11. Arc’teryx Aerios FL GTX ($170)

Category: Hiking shoe/trail runner
Weight: 1 lb. 5.2 oz.
Waterproof: Yes 
What we like: Light, tough, and extremely well-built. 
What we don’t: Pricey, on the stiffer side, and runs narrow.

Arc’teryx has been experimenting with footwear for years, from the Bora2 hiking boots to the Norvan trail runners. But until recently, the legendary Canadian brand had yet to release a true hiking shoe. Enter the Aerios FL, which is super lightweight at just a pound-and-a-half per pair, waterproof with a Gore-Tex membrane, and tough with a burly toe cap and a large swath of TPU around the bottom portion. All told, the Aerios is lighter than most hiking shoes, more protective than a trail runner, and more comfortable than the average approach shoe. For these reasons, it’s our favorite pair of Arc’teryx hiking footwear to date. 

We tested the Aerios FL on the Grand Canyon’s multi-day Escalante Route, which included off-trail scrambling with a loaded pack. The shoe felt a bit stiff at first—particularly under the heel—but it broke in nicely and ended up being comfortable during long days on the trail. In true Arc’teryx form, durability is excellent (we’ve been very impressed with the Cordura mesh upper in a number of their designs), and the generous toe cap adds a noticeable boost in protection. It all adds up to an impressively capable design that undercuts most of the hiking-specific competition in weight. However, the Aerios FL isn’t cheap at $170, and keep in mind that Arc’teryx shoes run noticeably narrow (one of our female testers has struck out with Arc'teryx shoes for this reason).
See the Arc'teryx Aerios FL GTX

 

12. Oboz Sapphire Low Waterproof ($140)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 8.6 oz.
Waterproof: Yes
What we like: Comfortable and great crossover appeal.
What we don’t: Stiff and some might find the heel too narrow.

If you’re wary of outdoor brands’ “shrink it and pink” tendencies, the women’s-only Oboz Sapphire is a nice solution. Combining feminine contours and tailoring with a waterproof, breathable design, the Sapphire holds its own both on and off the mountain. You get a tailored fit that reduces bulk and looks great for casual use, excellent stability with a nice combination of TPU and EVA foam in the midsole, and a long-lasting and protective nubuck leather upper. Taken together, the Sapphire is a high-quality, versatile hiking shoe, whether you’re above treeline or grabbing a post-hike beer in town.

Women with hard-to-please feet will likely appreciate the accommodating toe box of the Sapphire, but the narrow heel won’t work for everyone. The shoe also lacks that locked-in feel you get with top performers like the Salomon X Ultra or La Sportiva Spire above, pushing it down our list for serious trail endeavors. Finally, the Sapphire feels stiffer and clunkier than more modern designs, and the Swiftcurrent outsole isn’t as grippy as blends from Vibram or Contagrip (on the other hand, it lends more durability for use on pavement). Compared to Oboz’s Sawtooth (no longer featured on this list), the Sapphire has more crossover appeal but less protection and support overall. Finally, it does not come in a non-waterproof model, limiting its appeal for true summer use. 
See the Oboz Sapphire Low Waterproof

 

13. Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX ($150)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 9.6 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-GTX available)
What we like: A modern take on our top-ranked X Ultra 3.
What we don’t: Strange fit and odd underfoot feel.

The X Ultra 3 has been one of our favorite hiking shoes for years running, offering an exceptional combination of comfort, on-trail performance, and durability for everything from casual day hikes to long overnight missions. Last year, Salomon released an update to the much-loved shoe in the X Ultra 4 here. Beyond its sleeker and more modern look, the X Ultra 4 features a revised lacing system and chassis, along with a wider fit in the toe box. Importantly, the shoe retains the 3’s fantastic mix of agility, durability, and protection, and there’s enough cushioning underfoot for full days with a loaded pack. Finally, at 1 pound 9.6 ounces (our size 8.5 clocked in at 1 lb. 7.6 oz.), it’s also a close match to its predecessor in terms of weight.

Why hasn’t the latest X Ultra taken our top spot? In short, we’re not huge fans of the 4’s fit, which features a narrow midfoot along with a very spacious forefoot. For some, this offers a locked-down feel but perhaps too roomy of a toe box; for others (ourselves included), it’s ideal in the forefoot but too tight at the arch. Further, we found the X Ultra 4 to have an odd combination of stiffness in the heel and flexibility in the midfoot, which often resulted in sore feet. These differences are enough for us to hesitate in moving the updated shoe any higher on our list, but if you can try it on before you purchase (and it fits), the latest X Ultra is undeniably a high-performance, quality option... Read in-depth review
See the Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX

 

14. KEEN Targhee Vent ($155)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 8.7 oz.
Waterproof: No (waterproof available)
What we like: A durable trail workhorse.
What we don’t: Pricier than the Merrell Moab above without enough to show for it.

KEEN's Targhee Vent is a classic hiking shoe that goes head-to-head with designs like Merrell's Moab 2 above. The leather upper and sturdy outsole aren’t particularly lightweight (especially compared to modern trail runner-inspired designs), but the benefits are excellent stability over rough terrain, great long-term durability, and impressive all-around protection for your foot. The Targhee also boasts a noticeably wide toe box, which is great for accommodating swollen feet and a nice alternative to some of the narrower designs here (those with lower-profile feet might be better off with KEEN’s women’s-specific Terradora). If you’re in the market for a leather hiking shoe, KEEN's Targhee Vent is certainly worth adding to your list.

Among traditional day hiking options, the KEEN Targhee Vent and Merrell Moab 2 are two of the most popular shoes on the market. Both are very comfortable right out of the box, offer plenty of support and traction for non-technical trails, and can even get the job done on shorter backpacking trips. But while the Targhee’s nubuck leather upper is a little more durable than the mesh used on the Moab, we’re not sure it’s worth the $55 bump. Further, within this price class, the KEEN contends with more modern designs like the Salomon X Ultra 3 above, which offers a closer fit and better performance overall. But for traditionalists looking for a true leather hiker, it doesn’t get much better than the Targhee, which also comes in a waterproof version for $165.
See the KEEN Targhee Vent

 

15. Salomon Vaya Low GTX ($140)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 3.8 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-GTX available)
What we like: A women’s-specific shoe with an accommodating fit and comfy interior.
What we don’t: Not as performance-oriented as other Salomon offerings here.

The Vaya is Salomon’s women’s-specific collection, ranging from a lightweight, non-waterproof model to an insulated, faux fur-equipped winter version called the Vaya Blaze Thinsulate. The GTX here is our favorite low-top of the bunch, combining a low weight with quality materials at a reasonable price point. The SensiFlex synthetic upper is designed to stretch to accommodate natural foot swelling and offers excellent out-of-the-box comfort, while the 1-pound-3.8-ounce build is exceptionally nimble and agile on the trail. The Vaya won’t be confused for a rugged trail-worthy design like the La Sportiva TX4 above, but it’s reasonably supportive and protective enough for easy to moderate trips. 

How does the Vaya compare to other Salomon models? With respect to the Cross Hike GTX above, it costs $20 less, boasts standard laces rather than Quicklaces, and has a lower stack height that offers a slightly more planted feel. However, the wider shape feels a bit sloppier than the aggressive Cross Hike, and you get less cushioning for long days out. Alternatively, the X Ultra 3 GTX checks in a bit heavier and costs $10 more but comes with sizable boosts in support, durability, and traction. Added up, the Vaya isn’t Salomon’s most performance-oriented offering, but it’s an eye-catching lineup that places comfort first, carving out its place for new and casual hikers that plan to travel over fairly mellow terrain.
See the Salomon Vaya Low GTX

 

 16. Adidas Terrex Swift R3 GTX ($150)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 8 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-GTX available)
What we like: Tough, supportive, and protective for the weight.
What we don’t: Stiff and difficult to break in.

Adidas has expanded its hiking footwear line substantially in recent years, and the updated Terrex Swift R3 GTX is very capable on the trail. The sleek design is reminiscent of a Salomon shoe, and at 1 pound 8 ounces for the pair, the R3 GTX is relatively competitive weight-wise, too. The sole feels like a hiking boot, toe and protection around the side of the foot are impressive (similar to designs like the Cross Hike and Spire above, the collar is fairly high for a low-top shoe), and the Gore-Tex lining is waterproof without feeling swampy. That’s a winning formula for Adidas and has made the Terrex line quite popular.

Why is the Adidas Terrex Swift R3 ranked here? We found the shoe to be on the stiff side—it loosened up a bit after a couple of days of backpacking in Utah's Canyon Country, but the break-in period wasn’t fun and the stiffness remains noticeable. On the bright side, the rigidity translates to more support underfoot (especially helpful on tricky terrain or when carrying a load), and the Swift R3 is a noticeable savings compared to the similarly robust Spire above. But for greater comfort and versatility for the odd section of trail running, we prefer the more flexible Cross Hike, which also features Salomon's convenient Quicklace closure. In the end, the Swift R3 falls a bit short of the competition, but it's nevertheless a capable and time-tested hiker.
See the Adidas Terrex Swift R3 GTX

 

17. Merrell Siren Edge 3 ($105)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 2 oz.
Waterproof: No (waterproof available)
What we like: A sturdy and durable hiking shoe for just $105.
What we don’t: Sole is too firm; poor traction on wet surfaces.

Slotting in toward the bottom of our list is the Merrell Siren Edge 3. Like the Salomon Vaya and Oboz Sapphire above, this shoe is designed specifically with women in mind, and has been a crowd favorite for years (it’s now in its third iteration). Unlike the plush Salomon and Oboz, the Merrell streamlines its design, opting for minimal cushioning and a fairly sleek upper that result in great crossover appeal. But with robust materials, a stable heel cup, and a nylon shank, the Siren Edge is also surprisingly hardwearing, supportive, and protective on the trail. On paper, it’s a fairly impressive and versatile shoe, and the price is right at just $105 (and $120 for the waterproof version).

But after testing the Siren Edge during multiple day hikes, we hesitate to give it our wholehearted recommendation. Although the shoe offers fantastic stability and durability for the weight, the main tradeoff is comfort: The stiff materials (notably underfoot) resulted in significant foot pain, even after the break-in period. The design also translates to a rather clunky feel—the Siren Edge is much less nimble and flexible than similarly lightweight shoes like the Hoka One One Speedgoat above. And finally, its shallow and rounded lugs don’t provide great hold on soft terrain like mud and wet leaves. But if you’re looking to save some hard-earned cash and aren’t deterred by the Merrell’s weaknesses, the Siren Edge is a durable and lightweight option with great crossover appeal. For a bit more performance in an affordable and lightweight design, it’s also worth checking out Merrell's popular MQM Flex 2... Read in-depth review
See the Merrell Siren Edge

 

18. Brooks Cascadia 16 ($130)

Category: Trail runner/hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 3 oz.
Waterproof: No 
What we like: A classic thru-hiking shoe that offers a bit more stability than the Speedgoat above.
What we don’t: Fairly dated and fit will be too roomy for some.

Now in its 16th iteration, the Brooks Cascadia is one of the longest-standing trail runners on the market and particularly popular in the thru-hiking community. Like the Speedgoat and Lone Peak above, this shoe bridges the gap for speed-focused hikers with the support and protection you need for rugged trails alongside a hefty dose of cushioning for long days out. And at only 1 pound 3 ounces for the pair, it won’t weigh you down as much as the hiking-specific shoes here. Recent iterations of the Cascadia have started to feel really dated compared to the more modern trail runner competition, but the “16” is a nice middle ground for hikers looking for an effective balance of agility and stability.

How does the Cascadia compare with another darling of the thru-hiking world, the Altra Lone Peak above? Both offer a nice array of trail-ready features like tacky and aggressive rubber outsoles, drainage ports in the upper, and attachment points for gaiters. Fit is also surprisingly similar—both shoes feature fairly roomy toe boxes that are great for accommodating swollen toes (if your feet are on the narrow side, it might be worth considering the Speedgoat instead). One key difference is the Altra’s zero-drop shape compared with the Cascadia’s more traditional 8-millimeter drop, which is ultimately a matter of personal preference (but it does mean the Altra has more cushioning, especially under the forefoot).
See the Brooks Cascadia 16

 

Women's Hiking Shoe Comparison Table

Shoe	Price	Category	Weight	Waterproof	Upper
Salomon X Ultra 3 GTX	$150	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 7.2 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Synthetic/mesh
Merrell Moab 2 Ventilator	$110	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 11 oz.	No (available)	Leather/mesh
Hoka One One Speedgoat 4	$145	Trail runner	1 lb. 2.4 oz.	No (available)	Mesh
La Sportiva TX4	$140	Approach shoe	1 lb. 4.8 oz.	No	Leather
Salomon OUTline Low GTX	$130	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 4.5 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Synthetic/mesh
La Sportiva Spire GTX	$190	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 10.2 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Mesh
Scarpa Rush Low GTX	$189	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 7.3 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Synthetic/mesh
Salomon Cross Hike GTX	$160	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 6.9 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Synthetic
Danner Trail 2650 Campo	$160	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 2 oz.	No (available)	Leather/nylon
Altra Lone Peak 6	$140	Trail runner/hiking shoe	1 lb. 1.4 oz.	No (available)	Synthetic/mesh
Arc’teryx Aerios FL GTX	$170	Hiking shoe/trail runner	1 lb. 5.2 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Synthetic
Oboz Sapphire Waterproof	$140	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 8.6 oz.	Yes (B-Dry)	Leather
Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX	$150	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 9.6 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Synthetic
KEEN Targhee Vent	$155	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 8.7 oz.	No (available)	Leather
Salomon Vaya Low GTX	$140	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 3.8 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Synthetic
Adidas Terrex Swift R3 GTX	$150	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 8 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Synthetic
Merrell Siren Edge 3	$105	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 2 oz.	No (available)	Mesh
Brooks Cascadia 16	$130	Trail runner/hiking shoe	1 lb. 3 oz.	No	Synthetic

Women’s Hiking Shoe Buying Advice

• Women’s-Specific Hiking Shoes
• Hiking Footwear Types
• Weight
• Stability and Support
• Waterproofing
• Breathability
• Lacing Systems
• Upper Materials
• Midsoles: EVA Foam and TPU
• Outsoles and Traction
• Toe Protection
• Insoles
• Hiking Shoes vs. Hiking Boots

Women’s-Specific Hiking Shoes

In 2022, the vast majority of hiking shoes come in both men’s and women’s versions. In general, women’s shoes are designed to fit narrower heels and higher arches, come in women’s-specific sizes and widths, and are offered in a different set of colorways. There are also a few hiking shoes that were designed specifically with women in mind, including the Salomon Vaya, Oboz Sapphire, and Merrell Siren Edge. While the majority of our female friends wear women’s shoes, it’s important to note that some women might be better off opting for a men’s model (this is particularly important for those with high-volume feet). As with all clothing and footwear, your best bet is to try on before buying. 

Hiking Footwear Types

Hiking Shoes
For most day hikers—and even a good number of backpackers and thru-hikers—a hiking shoe that falls just below the ankle is the perfect match. In 2022, these shoes generally take on one of two forms: the majority are lightweight, trail-runner-inspired shoes, while more traditional holdouts are leather designs reminiscent of a hiking boot (but with a low top). Regardless of the style, most of these shoes offer ample stability, protection, and traction for tackling rough trails with a load by way of stiff midsoles and outsoles, toe caps, and reinforced uppers. Hiking shoes also are great options for folks needing a substantial shoe for daily wear—just be aware that the outsoles will wear faster on pavement.

Trail Running Shoes
If moving fast trumps all else, we’d recommend a trail running shoe. These shoes are gaining popularity for being the ultimate lightweight option and beloved among thru-hikers on long trails like the PCT and AT. However, trail runners are really not intended as backpacking footwear: the flexible midsoles don’t provide much support on technical terrain or while carrying a heavy load, durability suffers, and you get very little toe and underfoot protection. But for easy day hikes or experienced backpackers, it's hard to knock the comfort you get with a flexible build and cushioning underfoot. We include some great trail running and hybrid options here, but you can find more of our picks in our article on the best trail running shoes.

Approach Shoes
The third option has a relatively narrow focus: climbers or hikers that need a grippy shoe to tackle steep, rocky terrain (often part of the “approach” to a rock climb). Approach shoes are easy to spot: they have a large rubber toe rand, to-the-toe lacing, and a sticky, low-profile rubber compound underfoot for maximum grip on rock (look for shorter and more rounded lugs). These shoes can be plenty comfortable on day hikes but aren’t what we typically recommend as a daily driver: the tread isn't as secure on muddy trails, and they’re stiffer than most hiking shoes, which will result in discomfort on high-mileage days. But if your hikes include a lot of scrambling or rock hopping, an approach shoe can be an excellent choice. We’ve included one model on this list (the La Sportiva TX4), but for a complete look at the market, check out our article on the best approach shoes.

Weight

Over the past decade, one of the most significant advances in hiking shoes has been the move to lighter-weight designs. Tough but thin fabrics and the rising popularity of trail runners have made putting on major miles a lot easier. As a result, all of the shoes on our list weigh well under 2 pounds for the pair, with some dropping to just over a pound—by comparison, a traditional backpacking boot like the Asolo TPS 520 tips the scales at over 4 pounds. It's true that the drop in ounces sometimes impacts long-term durability, but there are still a number of compelling options for traditionalists, including the leather Merrell Moab and KEEN Targhee. But for most, a lightweight trail runner-inspired shoe is the best choice for day hikes, peak bagging, and quick overnight trips. As long as the rest of your gear is equally light, there are very few sacrifices.
 

Stability and Support

Regardless of whether you’re opting for a new-school synthetic model or a more traditional leather hiker, most hiking shoes retain good stability and support thanks to robust uppers and midsoles and relatively rigid soles. For example, despite having the appearance of a trail runner, the Scarpa Rush Low GTX incorporates a stiff TPU heel frame, along with a burly sole that prioritizes durability and traction on wet terrain. What’s more, protection is solid with toe caps, generous rands, and burly nylon or leather uppers. This is good news for most hikers, who will want the added performance for tricky terrain or while carrying a load.

If you do choose to go with a lightweight trail runner, keep in mind that the tradeoff is decreased stability and support. These shoes have more flexible midsoles, and the large dose of cushioning underfoot is great for comfort but offers less structure for off-camber sections of trail. The mesh upper of a trail runner also lacks around-the-foot protection and leaves your feet more vulnerable to roots and rocks. These are compromises that many day hikers (and well-conditioned backpackers) are willing to put up with for a more nimble, lightweight shoe. However, in most cases, we hesitate to recommend a trail running shoe for inexperienced hikers and difficult trails (including off-trail scrambling).
 

Waterproofing

Most of the hiking shoes here come in both waterproof and non-waterproof versions. The extra protection that comes with a waterproof and breathable membrane inserted into the shoe is a nice security blanket if you plan to hike in the mountains or in shoulder-season conditions, where wet feet can grow cold quickly. In theory, these shoes should keep your feet dry during creek crossings, surprise rainfall, or if you hit snow on an early-season trek. If you go this route, we’ve found Gore-Tex models to work consistently well, and many in-house designs are similarly capable of keeping water out (breathability is a different story), including the Oboz’s B-Dry in the Sapphire Waterproof.

However, there are a number of downsides to going with a waterproof shoe: the extra layer adds weight, impacts breathability fairly significantly (discussed below), and will run you around $20 to $30 more. Further, if you do get water inside your shoe (not a difficult task with a low-top design), it doesn’t drain as well and won’t dry out nearly as quickly as a non-waterproof option. If you tend to get out only in the summer months or live in a hot or dry area, we recommend a non-waterproof shoe in most cases. Another option that we’ve adopted for snowy summer hikes is to pair a non-waterproof shoe with a waterproof sock. This lends a lot of versatility: you get protection when you need it, but your shoe will still dry out quickly after a dousing. For more on the waterproofing debate, see our article Do You Need Waterproof Hiking Shoes?

Breathability

The truth about waterproof liners, even expensive Gore-Tex booties, is that they don’t breathe well—just as a waterproof jacket won’t be as breathable as a comparable non-waterproof version. Simply put, waterproof membranes restrict a shoe’s ability to pull moisture away from your sweaty feet as efficiently as a non-waterproof upper. Not all non-waterproof shoes should be treated equally, however. Footwear that features thinner fabrics and a lot of mesh will increase moisture transfer and airflow, which will keep feet less sweaty in hot weather as well as dry out soggy socks far more quickly. On the other hand, full-on leather shoes with built-in waterproofing—the KEEN Targhee III Waterproof comes to mind—will be among the least breathable.

Lacing Systems

Easily overlooked, laces—as well as the lacing system of hooks and eyelets—play an essential role in fit and comfort. If a shoe has a poor lacing system that is prone to loosening, you’ll find yourself having to readjust constantly on the trail. If the system itself doesn’t secure your heel very well, the up and down walking motion will create hot spots and blisters. If the culprit is just the laces themselves, it’s an easy fix: there are a number of good quality replacement laces available. But if the system design doesn’t hold your foot very well, we recommend looking elsewhere.

Some models, including the Salomon X Ultra 3 GTX, have a single-pull lacing system. The design is very convenient, and we’ve had no more issues with durability than traditional laces. One thing to keep in mind, however, is that you aren’t able to adjust the tension between eyelets, so the fit will be equally tight across the entire foot. In other words, those with finicky feet that need to fine-tune their laces to be comfortable may be better off avoiding quick-lace designs.

Upper Materials

Hiking shoe upper material is not the most exciting topic, but checking the construction can give helpful insights into the shoe’s performance. The type of material used will correlate directly with a shoe's longevity, water resistance, and ability to breathe. Most often, hiking shoes are made with a mix of nylon, mesh, and leather to balance cost, weight-savings, and durability. Below, we spell out the pros and cons for the most common materials used for hiking footwear.

Synthetic Nylon and Mesh
Woven synthetic (often nylon) as well as open synthetic mesh panels are commonly used to aid breathability. These materials are not as well-known for their durability, but they do a great job cutting weight and are generally easy to break in. Note that synthetic materials don’t conform to your foot over time as well as leather, but in most cases, the overall fit is still comfortable and snug. The majority of our favorite hiking shoes (and almost all modern designs) are made with synthetic materials, which provide a hard-to-beat balance of weight, durability, protection, and breathability.

Nubuck Leather
Made of full-grain leather but given a brushed finish that has a suede-like feel, nubuck leather is a common sight on heavier-duty hiking shoes. The softer-touch leather is lighter and more flexible than glossy, full-leather options and more durable than most nylons. It does fall short in breathability, however, and generally weighs more. As a result, it’s common to find a mix of leather and nylon mesh for abrasion resistance and breathability, as seen on the Merrell Moab 2 Vent and KEEN Targhee Vent. In the end, if you’re looking to prioritize durability and protection above all else, a leather hiking shoe is a good choice. But in general, these designs are a bit long in the tooth compared to modern synthetic shoes.

Midsoles: EVA Foam and TPU

The midsole of your hiking shoe functions to cushion your stride, working as a shock absorber from impacts and providing a stable base so your feet don’t have to work so hard on off-camber terrain. Depending on the design, midsoles vary from very thin (minimalist trail runner) to stiff and substantial (burly hiking shoe). Most include EVA, TPU, or a combination of both.

EVA
EVA foam midsoles are a common sight on running and hiking footwear. The cushy, soft material takes some of the sting out of both your heel impact and forefoot spring and is also extremely lightweight. While nearly all shoes on this list use some sort of EVA, designs can vary from super soft to mildly stiff. For logging serious miles on tougher terrain, we prefer a firm and supportive midsole as opposed to too much cushioning. If we’re planning on moving quickly on easy trail, softer cushioning is a better bet and commonly found in trail running designs like the Hoka One One Speedgoat. However, soft midsoles have a tendency to break down over time, so expect these shoes to pack out more quickly than dedicated hiking shoes.

TPU
Thermoplastic polyurethane, shortened (mercifully) to TPU, is a durable plastic commonly found in performance-oriented hiking shoes. Shoes that use TPU underfoot are often less cushy than those with only EVA but will last longer and provide better protection and stability underfoot. In addition, they’ll keep their shape longer and won’t be prone to compressing like EVA. Because both midsole types have valid applications and TPU is more expensive, it’s common for a manufacturer to use a TPU frame or heel for stability and toughness and add in EVA underfoot to increase comfort. Finally, the absence of TPU is a good way to differentiate a trail running shoe from a hiking shoe—most running designs forgo this plastic in order to stay flexible and cushioned, but the tradeoff is less stability and isolation from rough terrain.

Outsoles and Traction

One of the hallmarks of a hiking shoe is good traction on a variety of terrain. In a way that more casual footwear can never match, hiking and trail running footwear are leaps and bounds better when the going gets rocky, slippery, and steep. Vibram is the gold standard when it comes to outsole rubber, but not all Vibram compounds should be treated equally: The rubber manufacturer tailors their blends and designs for the specific footwear and brand. Some shoes have much larger and sharper lugs underfoot for serious grip in mud, while others prioritize sticky rubber for scrambling over rocks. 

Salomon is one brand that doesn’t outsource their traction needs. Instead, they use their in-house Contagrip for all of their hiking and trail running models. We’ve found the level of quality and performance is on par with Vibram’s offerings, from anything from their fast-and-light X Ultra 4 hiking shoes to the burly Quest 4 backpacking boots. Keep in mind that, like Vibram, Contagrip compounds can vary from shoe to shoe (there are a number of different compounds, including Contagrip MA, MD, and TA). For example, we found the Vaya to offer fairly unimpressive traction on wet terrain, whereas the Cross Hike excels in this environment.

Toe Protection

Hiking trails, even well-maintained ones, are full of rocks, roots, and other potential hazards, so we almost always recommend a hiking shoe with some type of toe cap. Lacking any protection on the front of your shoes can lead to a trip-ruining impact when you inevitably look up from the trail to enjoy the scenery. Hiking shoes typically have a full rubber toe cap, but trail runners sometimes have a trimmed-down version or none at all—one of the compromises in opting for a minimalist shoe. Approach shoes, on the other hand, have exceptional protection with a standard wraparound rubber rand and stiff midsole and outsole.

Insoles

Just like with running shoes, the stock insoles that come with nearly every hiking shoe are generally fairly cheap. For some, this might not make a difference, but for others, it’s what separates comfort from misery. Thankfully, removing your insoles is super easy, and replacing them with an aftermarket model that’s specific to your foot size and shape can remedy most shoe maladies. New insoles can provide more or less volume to fill out the shoe, improve the fit under the arch, and increase or decrease the cushion and impact absorption. We recommend checking out Superfeet insoles for their wide selection of options and trusted reputation in daily shoes, ski boots, and hiking footwear.
 

Hiking Shoes vs. Hiking Boots

One of the biggest trends we see across the board in the outdoor space is the move towards lighter-weight gear. This is exemplified in the world of hiking footwear, where, in just a couple short decades, we’ve gone from 4-pound leather boots being standard issue to the majority of hikers now wearing lightweight hiking shoes or trail runners. However, hiking boots still have their place, particularly for rugged terrain and schlepping a heavy multi-day load. We also specifically recommend a mid-height shoe for those needing extra protection around their ankles.

The biggest point of differentiation between hiking shoes and boots is height: shoes have a low-top fit, while boots generally sit above the ankle. Given their increased coverage, boots are able to offer a more secure fit, better stability, and more protection overall. Similar to hiking shoes, most modern hiking boots are built with lightweight materials and nicely balance agility and performance (even the Altra Lone Peak trail runner comes in a mid-height version). That said, for anything but the most rugged of trails or the heaviest loads, we still find ourselves reaching for a hiking shoe. You’ll have to decide for yourself, but both are viable options for day hiking, backpacking, and non-alpine peak bagging. For our breakdown of the top models on the market—including everything from mid-height trail running shoes to traditional leather designs—see our article on the best women's hiking boots.
Back to Our Top Women's Hiking Shoe Picks  Back to Our Women's Hiking Shoe Comparison Table